Yale’s division is among the few — indeed, we have been perhaps perhaps not conscious of every other — that provides qualitative and archival techniques as a thorough field that is doctoral. Many divisions offer graduate courses in qualitative practices. But, it would appear that we have been unique in providing a thorough field that certifies expertise within these practices.
Yale faculty people start to see the department’s dedication to doctoral training in qualitative and archival research as an element of our overarching commitment to pluralism that is methodological. We consider these procedures as complementary to analytical and formal techniques, all of these have actually diverse talents and weaknesses in confronting the difficulties of descriptive and causal inference.
We define “qualitative methods” broadly, including interviews, participant observation, ethnographic mapping, the recording of dental histories, focus teams, and historical supply analysis, along with some facets of studies (specially less structured protocols) and experiments ( ag e.g., debriefing after experiments).
Archival techniques usually face the exact same challenges to descriptive and causal inference and tend to be usually along with qualitative techniques (not to mention often additionally with formal and/or statistical techniques) in research on subjects which range from state building to governmental physical physical violence to welfare state policies and techniques to governance that is local. Continue reading Qualitative and Archival Practices Comprehensive Doctoral Field